Building Training Methodology: Preparing Invigilators for Active, In-person, Exam Management
PDF

Keywords

proctors
honour codes
academic integrity
exam management
face-to-face
post-graduate
test
active/passive

How to Cite

Cameron, T. L., Salvia, A. C., & Hirji, N. Z. (2023). Building Training Methodology: Preparing Invigilators for Active, In-person, Exam Management. Journal of Innovation in Polytechnic Education, 4(2), 22–31. Retrieved from https://jipe.ca/index.php/jipe/article/view/81

Abstract

This study assesses effective training methods that support in-person, post-graduate, exam invigilators to build awareness of institutional policies as well as heighten their comfort and confidence with invigilating in the exam setting. Vigilant, active invigilators are considered effective in reducing student cheating behaviour on exams (Alabi, 2014; Attoh Odongo et al., 2021; Feng & Ouyang, 2021; Siniver, 2013). This study followed 26 exam invigilators of varying experience through pre-training, training, and post-exam invigilation. Invigilators completed an online survey prior to participating in an in-person, half-day training session, self-identifying existing levels of experience, policy knowledge, and comfort/confidence in the exam setting in numerous situations. Upon completion of an in-person training session in a group setting, they completed a second online survey, which showed overall improvement. Invigilators were then assigned a live, in-person invigilation shift and following this, completed a third online survey. The study concludes that the training methods implemented foster confident and capable exam invigilators who support students’ compliance with academic integrity. With the shift to online testing during the COVID-19 pandemic, consideration needs to be given as to whether in-person invigilators retain the knowledge when they experience lengthy lapses of employment, and how their learned skills may be transferable to the online environment. 

PDF

References

Alabi, A. O. (2014). Effective invigilation as a panacea for examination malpractices among students of tertiary institutions in Nigeria (Version 1). Global Journal of Human-Social Science. A: Arts & Humanities – Psychology, 14(2), 58-62.

Anderson, H. M. (n.d.). Dale’s cone of experience https://www.queensu.ca/teachingandlearning/modules/active/documents/Dales_Cone_of_Experience_summary.pdf

Attoh Odongo, D., Agyemang, E., & Boulard Forkuor, J. (2021). Innovative approaches to cheating: An exploration of examination cheating techniques among tertiary students. Education Research International, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6639429

Birks, M., Mills, J., Allen, S., & Tee, S. (2020). Managing the mutations: Academic misconduct in Australia, New Zealand, and the UK. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 16(6), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-020-00055-5

Christensen Hughes, J, M., & McCabe, D. L. (2006). Academic misconduct within higher education in Canada. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 36(2), 1-21.

Dawson, P. (n.d.). Strategies for using online invigilated exams. TEQSA (Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency). https://www.teqsa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2022-10/strategies-for-using-online-invigilated-exams.pdf

Dendir, S., & Maxwell, R. S. (2020). Cheating in online courses: Evidence from online proctoring. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 2, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100033

D'Souza, K. A., & Siegfeldt, D. V. (2017). A conceptual framework for detecting cheating in online and take-home exams. Journal of Innovative Education, 15(4), 370-391. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12140

Fendler, R. J., & Godbey, J. M. (2016). Cheaters should never win: Eliminating the benefits of cheating. Journal of Academic Ethics, 14, 71-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-015-9240-8

Feng, H., & Ouyang, W. (2021). Analysis on the problems of college students cheating in examinations from the perspective of game theory. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 598. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Social Science and Higher Education (ICCSHE 2021).

Gary, C. J. (2020). Is in-person dental education in danger of disappearing? [Editorial]. The New York State Dental Journal (Aug/Sept. 2020), 1-4.

Gurung, R. A. R., Wilhelm, T. M., & Filz, T. (2012). Optimizing honor codes for online exam administration. Ethics & Behavior, 22(2), 158-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2011.641836

Happel, S. K., & Jennings, M. M. (2008). An economic analysis of academic dishonesty and its deterrence in higher education. Journal of Legal Studies Education, 25(2), 183-214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1722.2008.00051.x

Harris, L., Harrison, D., McNally, D., & Ford, C. (2019). Academic integrity in an online culture: Do McCabe’s findings hold true for online, adult learners? Journal of Academic Ethics, 18(4), 419-434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09335-3

HumberCTL. (n.d.). Playlists. [YouTube channel]. Retrieved December 6, 2022, from https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLVZd4Ttp3K9XVhZ75WjIdqmx7Eh1h5Zbi

Humber College. (2022). Humber admission requirements and academic regulations: Section 17.0 Academic Misconduct 2017-2018. https://academic-regulations.humber.ca/2017-2018/17.0-ACADEMIC-MISCONDUCT

Humber College. (2017, June). Test & exam policy. School of Health Sciences Humber ITAL.

Killam, L. A., Luctkar-Flude, M., Brune, S., & Camargo-Plazas, P. (2021). Redefining cheating on written exams: A shift toward authentic assessment to promote universal design for learning in the context of critical caring pedagogy.  Advances in Nursing Science, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0000000000000407

Levy, E. S., Rakovski, C. C. (2006). Academic dishonesty: A zero tolerance professor and student registration choices. Research in Higher Education, 47(6), 735-754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-006-9013-8

Mafa, O., & Gudhlanga, E. S. (2012). Examination management as a way of achieving quality assurance in ODL institutions. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), 147-157.

McCabe, D. L. (2005). Cheating among college and university students: A North American perspective. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 1(1), 1-11.

Minott, M. (2019). Building work-related knowledge about examination invigilation through reflective journaling. Journal of Workplace Learning, 32(2), 97-107. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-06-2019-0068

Parker, A. M., Watson, E., Dyck, N., & Carey, J. P. (2021, June 20-23). Traditional versus open-book exams in remote course delivery: A narrative review of the literature [Conference session]. Canadian Engineering Education Association Conference, Charlottetown, PEI, Canada. https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.vi0.14845

Pittman, V. (2015). Perspectives in AE – First system, best system: The proctored examination. New Horizons in Adult Education & Human Resource Development, 27(1), 44-50. https://doi.org/10.1002/nha3.20093

Ray, M. E., Daugherty, K. K., Lebovitz, L., Rudolph, M. J., Shuford, V. P., & DiVall, M. V. (2018). Best practices on examination construction, administration, and feedback [Editorial]. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 82(10), 1127-1132

Reedy, A., Pfitzner, D., Rook, L., & Ellis, L. (2021). Responding to the COVID-19 emergency:Student and academic staff perceptions of academic integrity in the transition to online exams at three Australian universities. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17(9), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00075-9

Shon, P. C. H. (2006). How college students cheat on in-class examinations: Creativity, strain, and techniques of innovation. Plagiary: Cross-Disciplinary Studies in Plagiarism, Fabrication, and Falsification, 130-148.

Siniver, E. (2013). Cheating on exams: The case of Israeli students. College Student Journal, 47(4), 593-604.

Stonecypher, K., & Wilson, P. (2014). Academic policies and practices to deter cheating in nursing education. Nursing Education Perspectives, 35(3), 167-179. https://doi.org/10.5480/12-1028.1

Tullis, J. G. & Goldstone, R. L. (2020). Why does peer instruction benefit student learning? Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(15). 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00218-5

Vasquez, J. J., Chiang, E. P., & Sarmiento-Barbieri, I. (2021). Can we stay one step ahead of cheaters? A field experiment in proctoring online open book exams. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 90, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2020.101653

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Innovation in Polytechnic Education

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.