Peer-Reviewed Articles
Original research papers: 3500–5000 words
Original research papers report on original empirical research, i.e., primary source. These papers report the methods and results of an original research study performed by the author(s). They can include methods and results concluded from analyzing raw data and conclusions drawn from the results of the analysis or focus on teaching and learning, research and innovation, and insights and observations resulting from participation in a research project or case study. We are especially interested in articles that inquire into driving improvement to student-centred academic programming and students’ learning outcomes. Papers may take a qualitative or quantitative approach (or a combination) – authors must clearly identify their approach.
Review articles: 3500–5000 words
Review articles provide a balanced synopsis of the current literature within a specific area of inquiry i.e., secondary source. These articles do not report original research of their own. Instead, they draw upon original research articles to suggest new research directions, strengthening support for existing theories and/or identifying patterns among existing research studies for further inquiry. Review articles should summarize the literature comprehensively and identify outstanding questions and areas for future inquiry.
Brief reports: 2500–3500 words
Brief reports present focused empirical or practice-based studies that are shorter and more limited in scope than full research papers. They may arise from pilot projects, small-scale or single-site studies, early phases of larger projects, or tightly framed classroom, workplace, or community interventions.
This category is also appropriate for case studies, capstone or course-based project reflections, auto-ethnographic accounts of teaching and learning, and other reflective analyses that are grounded in evidence. Brief reports should clearly describe the context, approach or method, key findings or insights, and their implications for polytechnic practice. As with other peer-reviewed categories, authors must situate their work in the relevant literature and acknowledge any prior work on which the report builds.
Innovation spotlights: 2500–3500 words
Innovation spotlights highlight innovative practices, approaches, or tools and provide accompanying evidence that speaks to the effectiveness of the innovation, including but not limited to an innovative teaching practice or methodology benefitting academia, industry and community partners. Innovation spotlights should include a brief review of the most relevant literature to situate the approach.
Non-Peer-Reviewed Articles
Book reviews: 1500–2500 words
Scholarly reviews of books are considered for publication, depending on the relevance of the book for the journal readership. These papers should present a summary of the book as well as a thoughtful reflection on the book’s strengths and weaknesses. Of critical importance is that the review situates the book within a teaching and learning as well as research and innovation framework.
Presentation summary: 1500–2500 words
Presentation summaries are brief summaries of presentations given at peer-reviewed conferences as part of the publication of conference proceedings. For reference, please take inspiration from JIPE Volume 2, No. 1 Special Issue: Proceedings of the Polytechnics Canada 2019 Annual Showcase(jipe.ca/index.php/jipe/issue/view/3)