Abstract
Amidst Canada’s productivity crisis and widening social inequities, Humber Polytechnic’s Building Brilliance vision proposes that economic and social development must be treated as mutually reinforcing priorities rather than competing priorities. Rather than optimizing traditional systems to reinforce the status quo, Building Brilliance aims to redesign Canada’s educational system by transforming pedagogy, embedding personalized learning pathways, rethinking assessment, leveraging Universal Design for Learning, recognizing prior learning and lived experience, and broadening access to valued forms of economic, cultural, and social capital. Through its polytechnic approach, Humber opens new pathways for learners to acquire and convert capital in ways that enable fuller, more equitable participation in high-demand sectors of the workforce through flexible, learner-centred educational journeys while remaining deeply anchored in the needs of local communities.
Situated within Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of capital and educational reproduction, this paper examines how traditional post-secondary institutions disproportionately reward learners whose cultural capital already aligns with dominant academic norms, thereby reproducing social inequality under the guise of meritocracy. While Bourdieu’s analysis emerged from a specific historical and national context, its insights remain highly relevant to contemporary Canadian post-secondary systems shaped by inherited structures of recognition, credentialing, and access. In contrast, Humber’s Building Brilliance vision challenges these mechanisms by shifting from a model of educational reproduction to one of intentional system redesign that prioritizes learner agency, flexibility, and recognition of diverse forms of capital.
This paper argues that polytechnic education, when deliberately structured around learner-centred pedagogies, personalized learning models enabled by inclusive design, and authentic, flexible assessment practices, can disrupt entrenched inequities while enhancing economic productivity. In doing so, Humber is positioned as an institutional exemplar and catalyst for systems-level transformation, demonstrating how expanding participation in higher education can simultaneously advance social equity, strengthen economic resilience, and redefine excellence in the Canadian post-secondary landscape.
References
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2013). Outline of a theory of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1977)
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. Sage.
CAST. (2024). CAST universal design for learning guidelines version 3.0. https://udlguidelines.cast.org
Corral, D. (2025). Are all degrees worth the same? A comparative analysis of community college and university baccalaureate graduates’ financial outcomes. Community College Review, 53(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/00915521251398470
Humber Polytechnic. (2024a). Building brilliance: Our vision to 2030 and beyond. https://humber.ca/about/building-brilliance/building-brilliance
Humber Polytechnic. (2024b, December 12). Humber Polytechnic leads the charge in seamless credit transfers. https://humber.ca/today/media-releases/humber-polytechnic-leads-charge-seamless-credit-transfers
Medvetz, T., & Sallaz, J. J. (Eds.). (2018). The Oxford handbook of Pierre Bourdieu. Oxford University Press.
Northedge, A. (2003). Rethinking teaching in the context of diversity. Teaching in Higher Education, 8(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356251032000052302
Smith, M. K. (2025). Pierre Bourdieu on education: Habitus, capital, and field. Reproduction in the practice of education. https://infed.org/dir/welcome/pierre-bourdieu-habitus-capital-and-field-exploring-reproduction-in-the-practice-of-education/
Yosso, T. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361332052000341006

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Ann Marie Vaughan
