Sexual education for individuals with special needs: Understanding and overcoming current obstacles
PDF

Keywords

neurodiverse population
sexual education
qualitative research
observation
questionnaire

Categories

How to Cite

Melnikova, A. (2024). Sexual education for individuals with special needs: Understanding and overcoming current obstacles. Journal of Innovation in Polytechnic Education, 6, 40–54. https://doi.org/10.69520/jipe.v6i.195

Abstract

Sexual education has often been a highly debatable, underrated, and undervalued topic. Efforts to address this neglect have yielded significant progress. It is now integrated into numerous countries' educational systems curricula and has been actively promoted. However, progress in this realm has primarily favoured the neurotypical population, leaving the topic of sexuality and individuals with disabilities greatly undervalued and underrepresented. Additionally, existing policy frameworks frequently overlook the unique needs of individuals with disabilities, resulting in uneven delivery and quality of sexual education and programs.

Despite ongoing efforts, numerous obstacles persist, impeding equal access and distribution of sexual education and resources for individuals with special needs. These challenges raise important questions: Do these challenges differ depending on an individual's cultural background, gender identity or age? What sex education programs are available for the neurodiverse population? How can the existing barriers be effectively addressed?

This study aims to answer: “What are the barriers preventing equal access to sexual education or resources for individuals with special needs? How can these barriers be overcome?” Utilizing a qualitative approach, the study will involve direct observation of sexual education training for students with special needs, complemented by an online questionnaire featuring qualitative questions.

In this study, "people with special needs" encompasses individuals with different abilities across a range of conditions and severity levels, including those experiencing movement impairments and other challenges that necessitate special assistance. However, the challenges discussed in the current study predominantly pertain to those with the most severe developmental, cognitive, and physical conditions.

https://doi.org/10.69520/jipe.v6i.195
PDF

References

Bahner, J. (2018). Cripping sex education: lessons learned from a programme aimed at young people with mobility impairments. Sex Education, 18(6), 640–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2018.1456417

Cascio, M. A., Lee, E., Vaudrin, N., & Freedman, D. A. (2019). A team-based approach to open coding: Considerations for creating intercoder consensus. Field Methods, 31(2), 116–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X19838237

Curtiss, S. L., & Stoffers, M. (2023). Service models for providing sex education to individuals with intellectual disabilities in the United States. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 174462952311646. https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295231164662

Davies, A. W. J., Bryan, M. K., Martin, T., Shay, B., Akers, T., Soud, R., Balter, A.-S., O’Leary, S., & Neustifter, R. (2023). Dismantling barriers to access: The necessity of cripping sexuality education in Canadian schools. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 32(1), 1-. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.2022-0031

Frawley, P., & Wilson, N. J. (2016). Young people with intellectual disability talking about sexuality education and information. Sexuality and Disability, 34(4), 469–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-016-9460-x

Gokgoz, C., Deliktas Demirci, A., & Kabukcuoglu, K. (2021). Sexual behaviours and education in adolescents and young adults with Down syndrome: A grounded theory study of experiences and opinions of their mothers in Turkey. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 112, 103907–103907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2021.103907

Hayashi, M., Arakida, M., & Ohashi, K. (2011). The effectiveness of a sex education program facilitating social skills for people with intellectual disability in Japan. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 36(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2010.549463

Hole, R., Schnellert, L., & Cantle, G. (2022). Sex: What is the big deal? Exploring individuals’ with intellectual disabilities experiences with sex education. Qualitative Health Research, 32(3), 453–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323211057090

Lafferty, A., McConkey, R., & Simpson, A. (2012). Reducing the barriers to relationships and sexuality education for persons with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 16(1), 29-43. https://doi-org.ezproxy.humber.ca/10.1177/1744629512438034

Lam, A., Yau, M. K., Franklin, R. C., & Leggat, P. A. (2022). Challenges in the delivery of sex education for people with intellectual disabilities: A Chinese cultural‐contextual analysis. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 35(6), 1370–1379. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.13025

McCarthy, M., Frawlie, P., Gil-Llario, M. D., Castro-Calvo, J., Fernández-García, O., Elipe-Miravet, M., & Ballester-Arnal, R. (2022). Estimating sexual knowledge of people with mild intellectual disability through a valid and reliable assessment scale: The ISK‐ID. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 35(4), 988–1000. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12909

McDaniels, B., & Fleming, A. (2016). Sexuality education and intellectual disability: Time to address the challenge. Sexuality and Disability, 34(2), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-016-9427-y

Michielsen, K., & Brockschmidt, L. (2021). Barriers to sexuality education for children and young people with disabilities in the WHO European region: A scoping review. Sex Education, 21(6), 674–692.

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Pownall, J. D., Jahoda, A., & Hastings, R. P. (2012). Sexuality and sex education of adolescents with intellectual disability: Mothers’ attitudes, experiences, and support needs. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 50(2), 140–154. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-50.2.140

Schaafsma, D., Kok, G., Stoffelen, J. M. T., & Curfs, L. M. G. (2015). Identifying effective methods for teaching sex education to individuals with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review. Journal of Sex Research, 52(4), 412–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2014.919373

Schaafsma, D., Kok, G., Stoffelen, J. M. T., van Doorn, P., & Curfs, L. M. G. (2014). Identifying the important factors associated with teaching sex education to people with intellectual disability: A cross-sectional survey among paid care staff. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 39(2), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2014.899566

Young, R., Gore, N., & McCarthy, M. (2012). Staff attitudes towards sexuality in relation to gender of people with intellectual disability: A qualitative study. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 37(4), 343–347. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2012.704983

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.